Federal Employment Lawyers Who Get Results

AWOL, which stands for ‘Absence Without Leave,’ is a term commonly used in work settings. It refers to an employee’s unauthorized absence from their duty or workplace without prior approval. When an employee goes AWOL, it typically results in a non-pay status, as their absence has not been officially sanctioned by their employer. It is also a common charge of discipline within the federal government. Note though that AWOL is not in and of itself discipline, although it may lead to discipline. A charge of AWOL can result in a reprimand, suspension, or even removal from the federal service. Being charged with AWOL is a serious matter. But it need not be the end of your career. If your agency has charged you with AWOL, it’s imperative you find a qualified federal employment law to help represent you and defend your rights, especially if disciplinary action is proposed or imposed.  What Does AWOL Mean? Again, AWOL means “absence without leave” or “absent without official leave.” As with any other job, showing up for work on time is an essential requirement for federal employment. There is no minimum time requirement for AWOL. Although more accommodating managers may cut an employee slack for ten or fifteen minutes late, even a five-minute absence can lead to a charge of AWOL. Several other situations can lead to a charge of AWOL: What Are the Elements of an AWOL Charge? If a federal agency wants to use AWOL as a basis for discipline, it must prove two key points of AWOL charge. #1: The federal employee was absent from work As we mentioned earlier, there are a variety of circumstances that can lead to an employee being absent. Consequently, it is often relatively easy for an employer to prove this part of the charge. But you can contest this point by providing evidence that you were at your place of work during the time period in dispute.  #2: The federal employee’s absence was not authorized Federal managers have the right to deny personal leave requests for legitimate reasons. However, they cannot refuse your leave for discriminatory reasons or for retaliatory reasons. Supervisors can also revoke their authorization of a leave request, but it also must be for appropriate reasons. It is not unheard of for retaliatory managers to grant an employee leave, revoke it at the last minute, and then try to charge an employee AWOL. If you think your leave was revoked because you made a complaint, you may be eligible for compensation. A qualified employment attorney can help you demonstrate the connection between your protected activity and any retaliatory activity (including the cancellation of leave).  Need Help With Absence Without Leave (AWOL) Issues? Contact Us Today! What Is the Standard of Proof in an AWOL Case? The phrase “standard of proof” refers to the level of evidence the government needs to have to succeed in its case against the federal employee. There are four standards of proof: The “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard of proof is the most stringent standard and is not used in administrative charges like this. The “substantial evidence” standard is the easiest standard for a party to meet. For most disciplinary actions against federal employees, the “preponderance of the evidence standard” applies. To meet a “preponderance of the evidence” standard, the government provides enough evidence to show the judge that there is a greater than 50% chance that the alleged misconduct—a period of AWOL, for example—actually occurred.  Defenses to AWOL Charges There are a few common defenses employees can assert to AWOL charges. First, the employee can allege that the government’s charge is based on some kind of discrimination. The law prohibits many kinds of discrimination in the federal workplace, including discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, and disability. At first glance, you may not think that any of these apply to you. However, it is helpful to take a moment to consider whether any of your colleagues have been in your situation. For example, do you know a colleague of a different race who showed up late to work one day but was not charged with AWOL? Has your supervisor treated you worse than other colleagues of a different sexual orientation or gender? Are you charged AWOL every time you ask for leave to see your doctor for medical appointments? Think carefully—workplace discrimination can often show up in subtle ways.  What If My Supervisor Marked Me as AWOL for Being on Active Military Duty? Many federal employees are veterans of the armed forces. Some of these veterans retire before they enter federal service. Others are reservists. The law prohibits federal employers from discriminating against a reservist because of their reserve duty requirements. Similarly, if a federal employee who is also a reservist is called into active duty, they cannot be marked as AWOL. If your supervisor marked you as AWOL after you were ordered to active military duty, you might be able to sue them for military discrimination.  What Are My Rights If I Have Been Charged with AWOL? Most private-sector employees have few due process rights. This means their employer is free to punish them without notice and without providing them any opportunity for rebuttal or defense.  Thankfully, United States Code guarantees federal employees due process once they complete their probationary period. As a result, your employer generally cannot simply fire you or punish you for being AWOL. Instead, they generally have to provide you with: Without these protections, any adverse action taken against you can be thrown out for violating your rights.   Charged with AWOL? Let a Knowledgeable AWOL Attorney Help You Today If your federal employer has charged you with AWOL, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed. You may feel tempted to simply “roll over” and accept the agency’s punishment, but you shouldn’t. Take a stand instead. Fight for your rights and for your federal career.  At the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing, PLLC, we care about your well-being...

When you’re a federal employee, learning you’re the subject of a proposed adverse action can be frustrating and confusing—especially if you think your agency is acting unjustly. However, unlike many private-sector workers, federal employees don’t necessarily have to accept unfair discipline at the hands of an employer.  Federal law prohibits government employers from firing or disciplining most civil servants without a good reason, such as poor performance or misconduct. When an agency doesn’t follow these rules, eligible federal employees can appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to challenge their adverse action and potentially have it reversed.  In this blog post, we’ll explain who can appeal adverse actions to the MSPB, which civil servants are exempt from appeal rights, and what disciplinary actions can be appealed.  Who Can Appeal Adverse Actions to the MSPB? Not all government workers have the right to challenge an adverse action before the MSPB. The eligibility requirements for MSPB appeals rights are in Title 5 of the U.S. Code, the primary set of laws covering federal employees. Whether you have the right to appeal depends on various factors, including your employment category, how long you’ve been working, and the type of adverse personnel action you’re facing.  Under Chapter 75 of Title 5, you are typically eligible to appeal adverse actions to the MPSB if you are: Certain federal employees are also explicitly excluded from the right to appeal to the MSPB, including: If you’re unsure whether you have MSPB appeal rights, consult with your agency’s Human Resources department or a federal employment lawyer.  Can You Appeal an Adverse Action If You Don’t Work for a Federal Agency? Put simply, yes, you may still have the right to appeal an adverse action, even if a federal agency doesn’t employ you.  This question arose in a 2022 case involving an Office of Administration (OA) employee, which supports the Executive Office of the President. The employee had successfully appealed their case to an MSPB administrative judge, who reduced the OA’s proposed removal to a 60-day suspension. In response, the OA argued that the employee didn’t have a right to appeal to the MSPB since the OA is not technically an “agency” as recognized by federal law.  However, the MSPB clarified in their final opinion that an employee’s right to appeal an adverse action is not strictly limited to employees of federal agencies. Instead, the MPSB clarified that appeals rights hinged on whether a civil servant met the eligibility requirements established by Title 5.  Ultimately, government employees who meet all these criteria and are not expressly excluded from appeals rights may still challenge an adverse personnel action before the MSPB.  What Is an Adverse Action for MSPB? An adverse action is an unfavorable change to an employee’s job status or pay made by a federal employer. Adverse personnel actions include: Unlike in the private sector, federal employers must have concrete, documented reasons (i.e., “cause”) for enforcing an adverse personnel action. They also must follow specific procedures intended to ensure fairness in the disciplinary process, such as providing advance notice to an affected employee and allowing them an opportunity to respond. Employees may exercise their right to an MSPB appeal when employers don’t follow these rules. Protect Your Rights with the Help of a Skilled Advocate Understanding your rights is critical if you are a federal employee facing an adverse action. The MSPB appeal process can be complex, and having an experienced advocate by your side can make all the difference. The Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing has spent years empowering federal workers to understand and exercise their unique rights as employees. Our team has helped hundreds of clients navigate employment disputes, fight unfair discipline, and even reverse proposed removals. We have extensive experience with MSPB appeals across virtually all aspects of the federal government, and we’re prepared to help ensure your voice is heard. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can assist you.

If you find yourself on this web page right now, you probably already know a bit about the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). Under the FERS retirement disability program, workers who find themselves injured or otherwise disabled receive employment security benefits if they are unable to work due to their condition. But, what is considered a disability? Sometimes the benefits are temporary, but sometimes they are permanent. Furthermore, the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) prevents employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of disability.  Some of the most common disability-related questions we get from our clients at the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D Wersing have to do with what the FERS and ADA consider a disability. Those questions include things like: If you have any of these or other related questions, you’re in the right place. We put together this page specifically to help you assess whether your injury qualifies you for disability benefits. What Is Considered a Disability? So, what is considered a disability? There are quite a few different medical conditions that FERS considers disabilities. In fact, there are too many to cover here. You can, however, find an exemplary list that the Social Security Administration (SSA) uses in its entirety right here. While FERS doesn’t use the exact same list, the two are very similar. After all, they both come from the federal government and serve near-identical functions. In all, the SSA’s list contains 14 categories of impairments:  This list encompasses a very broad range of different medical conditions and disabilities. At the end of the day, the most important element in qualifying for disability is demonstrating your inability to function at work as you would without the disorder. Additional Common Disorders Injuries to hands, feet, and other extremities can qualify you for disability benefits if you are unable to work. For example, it’s possible you can get disability for plantar fasciitis, arthritis, or tendon damage. It all depends on the circumstances of the injury and your job duties.  If you injure yourself enough to warrant an amputation, chances are you qualify for disability. The federal government considers thumb amputation a disability. In fact, the federal government considers any finger amputation a disability. While losing a finger may not seem as extreme a disability as a terminal illness, losing a digit can significantly impede one’s ability to work. If you’re wondering whether cancer is a disability, the answer is a resounding yes. FERS, the SSA, and the federal government as a whole all consider cancer a disability, as does the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). In fact, you may have noticed that cancer warrants its own category in the SSA’s full list of medical conditions. Cancer itself, and many of the treatments associated with it, take a significant toll on patients’ bodies. As a result, working is often entirely out of the question for individuals with cancer. Excluding cancer in any form from the list of disabilities would be entirely inappropriate. Need Help Filing Your Disability Claim? Contact Our Federal Disability Lawyers Today More often than not, the most difficult part of getting disability benefits is proving that your condition is sufficient to render you unable to work in your position of record. The problem is that there is a subjective element in determining whether someone can work or not. The best thing you can do to ensure this process moves forward is with the help of a FERS disability attorney. They can help you gather evidence that proves your disability’s impact on your life. At the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D Wersing, federal disability benefits are one of our legal team’s primary focus areas. You have rights, so let us help you fight to protect them. Have a look at some of our client testimonials, then let’s get started. Call today!