- Consultations
Federal agencies have a legal and proactive duty to provide reasonable accommodations to qualified employees with physical or mental disabilities. These rights are protected under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which applies to federal employees and incorporates the protections of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Despite these clear legal obligations, many federal employees face unnecessary delays, denials, or retaliation after requesting accommodations. When agencies fail to engage in the required process or improperly deny requests, they may be violating federal law.
The Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing PLLC represents federal employees nationwide in reasonable accommodation and disability discrimination matters. We help employees navigate the interactive process, challenge unlawful denials, and hold agencies accountable when they place bureaucratic resistance above employee rights.
A reasonable accommodation is any modification to the work environment or the way job duties are customarily performed that enables an employee with a disability to enjoy equal employment opportunity.
In the federal workplace, reasonable accommodations commonly include:
The purpose of an accommodation is not to eliminate essential job functions, but to allow the employee to perform them effectively.
Once a federal employee requests an accommodation, the agency is legally required to engage in the interactive process. This is an ongoing, good-faith dialogue between the employee and the agency intended to identify an effective accommodation.
Agencies violate the law when they:
The interactive process is a two-way street, but agencies often treat it as a one-sided approval process controlled by management. When that happens, legal intervention is often necessary.
Disability discrimination in the federal sector typically appears in one of two ways.
An agency commits disability discrimination when it refuses to provide a reasonable accommodation that would not cause undue hardship. This includes ignoring requests, stalling indefinitely, or denying accommodations without a legally sufficient justification.
Discrimination also occurs when an employee is treated unfavorably because of their disability or because they requested an accommodation. This may include:
Retaliation for requesting an accommodation is strictly prohibited under federal law.
Agencies frequently deny accommodation requests by claiming undue hardship. However, in the federal government, this is a high legal standard.
Undue hardship does not mean inconvenience, supervisor preference, or minor expense. The agency must show that the accommodation would cause significant difficulty or expense when viewed in light of the entire agency’s resources and operations, not just a single office or supervisor’s workload.
Claims of undue hardship are often exaggerated or unsupported, and they can be challenged through the EEO process.
If your agency denies your accommodation request, delays unreasonably, or retaliates against you, you generally have 45 calendar days from the discriminatory act to contact an EEO Counselor.
Missing this deadline can permanently bar your claim, even if the agency’s conduct was unlawful. Early legal guidance is often the most effective way to protect both your health and your career.
Federal agencies often rely on internal Reasonable Accommodation Coordinators and agency counsel whose role is to protect management decisions. Without legal representation, employees are frequently pressured into accepting inadequate accommodations or abandoning requests altogether.
Our firm levels the playing field by:
Because we focus exclusively on federal employment law, we understand the procedural traps agencies use to avoid accountability.
You should not have to choose between managing your health and preserving your federal career. When agencies fail to meet their legal obligations, experienced legal advocacy can make a critical difference.
To discuss your situation, contact the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing PLLC at (866) 249-0748 or complete our online consultation form. Taking action early helps preserve your rights and strengthens your case.
No. Federal employees may request accommodations orally or in writing using plain language. However, a written request is strongly recommended because it creates documentation that can be critical if the agency later disputes the request.
An agency must provide an effective accommodation, but it does not necessarily have to be the exact one you requested. However, if the proposed accommodation does not allow you to perform your essential job functions, it may not satisfy legal requirements.
Yes. Under the ADA Amendments Act (ADAAA), which applies to the Rehabilitation Act, many temporary conditions qualify as disabilities if they substantially limit a major life activity.
This is common. Even when medical documentation supports an accommodation, supervisors may claim it “doesn’t work for the team.” Supervisor preference alone does not establish undue hardship, and such denials can often be challenged successfully.
No. Retaliation for requesting a reasonable accommodation is illegal. If you experience discipline, negative evaluations, or other adverse actions after making a request, you may have a separate retaliation claim.
Yes. Accommodation requests and EEO complaints often proceed in parallel. In many cases, filing an EEO complaint becomes necessary when the accommodation process breaks down or becomes unlawfully delayed.
* Required Fields