Mar 27, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 3 minutes | Federal Disability

Can You Sue for ADA Violations in the Federal Workplace?

Our country depends on thousands of federal employees with disabilities who provide critical service every day to keep the government running. Unfortunately, many capable federal employees still face unfair treatment and discrimination due to their medical conditions. Whether your employer refuses to provide reasonable accommodations, retaliates against you for requesting them, or treats you unfavorably because of your condition, it’s not just frustrating—it’s a violation of the protections laid out in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) as federal law. Many federal employees in this situation wonder: Can you sue for ADA violations? In this blog post, we’ll answer this common question and explain what government employees should know about their legal rights under federal disability law. What Is an ADA Lawsuit? An ADA lawsuit is a legal action filed by an employee who has experienced disability discrimination at work. Under the ADA, private-sector and state or local government employees can sue their employers if they face discrimination because of a qualifying physical or mental impairment. Common employer ADA violations that can lead to a lawsuit include: If a lawsuit is successful, employer penalties for ADA violations can include fines and mandatory policy changes. Employees may also receive back pay, job reinstatement, and reasonable work accommodations through an ADA lawsuit. Can You Sue for ADA Violations in the Federal Workplace? It is just as illegal for government employers to violate federal disability laws as it is for private-sector employers. However, federal employees who experience disability discrimination take action under a different law: the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which upholds rights and protections specifically for federal employees with disabilities. Although the Rehabilitation Act predates the ADA by nearly two decades, the two laws use almost identical standards and protections. So, when can you sue for ADA violations if you’re a federal employee? When your employer denies you any of the rights or protections you’re entitled to under federal disability law. However, you will pursue your claim through a slightly different legal route under the Rehabilitation Act rather than the ADA. How to Sue for an ADA Violation in the Federal Workplace Filing a lawsuit for disability discrimination as a federal employee involves several steps. Unlike private-sector employees, federal workers go through a different administrative complaint process before taking their disability discrimination case to court. Here’s how the process works: Federal employees generally have up to 90 days after receiving a final decision to seek legal counsel and sue for disability discrimination. However, it’s in your best interest to consult with a legal professional from the start—as soon as you suspect your rights have been violated. A skilled federal employment lawyer can evaluate your situation, explain your legal options in detail, and support you throughout the process of getting justice. Steadfast Advocacy for Federal Workers Fighting disability discrimination on your own can be exhausting, especially when facing a complex administrative and legal process. Fortunately, you don’t have to navigate this battle alone. At the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing PLLC, we help government employees challenge workplace discrimination and advocate for their rights. With years of experience serving employees across the federal government, attorney Aaron Wersing understands the complexities of the Rehabilitation Act and is prepared to guide you through every step of the process to assert your rights. Contact our office today to schedule a consultation and learn more about how we can help.

Mar 17, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 4 minutes | Workplace Discrimination

Reverse Discrimination in the Workplace—What You Should Know

We all know that discrimination in the workplace is unacceptable, and we all know that no federal employee should have to put up with it. However, not everyone knows that all kinds of discrimination are illegal. When most people imagine a discriminatory situation, they imagine racial minorities as the victims of racial “majorities.” They may be more accepting of discrimination when it operates in “reverse.” However, so-called reverse race discrimination is equally wrong and just as illegal as “regular” discrimination. At this point, you might be asking yourself, What is reverse discrimination? In this article, we will discuss reverse discrimination definition and the situations which best describe reverse discrimination in the workplace. If you think that you are the victim of reverse race discrimination, contact a workplace discrimination lawyer right away. What Is Reverse Discrimination? The term “reverse race discrimination” is sometimes considered controversial, and its definition can be challenging to explain. Reverse discrimination occurs when members of a dominant group face bias in favor of minority or disadvantaged groups. Reverse discrimination based on race or ethnicity is known as reverse racism. The idea of “reverse racism” focuses on prejudiced attitudes or discrimination against certain racial groups but overlooks a central aspect of racism: power. Racism is defined as “prejudice plus institutional power,” highlighting systemic inequities. The simplest definition is this – reverse discrimination occurs when majority groups, such as white men, face unfavorable workplace decisions due to their race or gender. Reverse race discrimination, for example, occurs in situations where historic racial minorities (like blacks or Hispanics) discriminate against white Americans based on their skin color. The fact that the target of discrimination belongs to a majority group does not exclude them from the protection of workplace discrimination laws. Discrimination is discrimination. It does not matter whether the victim is white, black, Christian, Muslim, handicapped, or able-bodied. Workplace discrimination lawyers know that discrimination laws apply to all groups, and can help any victim of any form of discrimination. Which of the Following Is an Example of Reverse Discrimination? Let’s consider a few examples of discrimination to understand which of the following situations constitute reverse discrimination: Which of the following is an example of reverse discrimination in America? If you guessed the first two scenarios, you’d be correct. The first scenario was reverse race discrimination because a black man, a member of a racial minority, was discriminating against a white man based on race. Similarly, the second scenario also constituted reverse discrimination. Sex-based discrimination has historically targeted women, so reverse discrimination occurred because a woman was making condescending sex-based comments to a man. However, the third scenario was not reverse discrimination because Christianity is a majority religion in the United States. So while the Christian in that scenario was harassing and potentially discriminating against their Hindu coworker, that would constitute normal discrimination of a minority. What Should I Do If I Am the Victim of Reverse Discrimination? Discrimination remains the same regardless of the victim’s race, gender, or religion. If you are experiencing reverse discrimination, consider taking the following actions: After you have taken these first steps, you need to consider hiring an attorney who handles cases of discrimination at work. Hiring an attorney for employment discrimination can help to resolve the reverse discrimination problem quickly. Furthermore, employment discrimination attorneys are familiar with all kinds of discrimination and can evaluate your case to see if you are eligible to obtain compensation. Finally, if you file a complaint against your agency, a federal employment workplace discrimination lawyer can help your case by collecting evidence, obtaining witnesses, and conducting settlement negotiations. Do You Need a Workplace Discrimination Attorney? Employment discrimination is always wrong, including reverse discrimination. Now that you know reverse discrimination’s definition, you will know when to contact an employment discrimination attorney. If you are currently experiencing such discrimination, you need an employment discrimination attorney right away. However, not all attorneys are of the same quality. Therefore, it is critical that you hire an attorney that has experience with your kind of case and is familiar with the unique features of the federal workplace. Contact Our Federal Employment Attorney To Discuss Your Case Today Here at the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D Wersing PLLC, we are dedicated to helping federal employees stand up for their rights. Over the years, our firm has helped countless federal employees with all kinds of discrimination complaints. Unlike other law firms, we are familiar with all of the dynamics of the federal workplace. We will help you stand up for your rights and hold discriminatory actors accountable. Even if you don’t know whether you need an attorney, you have nothing to lose by setting up an appointment. Contact us right away.

Feb 19, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 3 minutes | MSPB

What Is the MSPB Discovery Process & Why Is It Important?

For federal employees, preparing your appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) can feel complex and intimidating. Even though it’s your legal right to challenge unfair or unjust adverse employment actions, many employees still feel disadvantaged compared to their agencies. Fortunately, employees can access a powerful tool to help level the playing field: the MSPB discovery process. During discovery, federal workers can obtain crucial evidence that can make a significant difference in the outcome of their appeal. In this blog post, we’ll explain what federal employees should know about the discovery process in MSPB cases and how they can use it strategically to protect themselves and their careers. What Is the MSPB Discovery Process? Discovery is the legal process where both parties in a dispute exchange information before they meet in a formal hearing. It allows each side to gather and understand the evidence the other side is relying on. In MSPB appeals, discovery allows federal employees to collect documents, records, and testimony that can challenge the legitimacy of their agency’s decision. If you intend to claim that discrimination, retaliation, or procedural errors were behind your agency’s actions, discovery is vital to gathering the concrete evidence you might otherwise not have access to. What Does the MSPB Discovery Process Involve? Under MSPB discovery rules, federal employees must begin making information requests no later than 25 days after the acknowledgment order for the appeal is issued. The scope of federal discovery rules allows employees to request any information that they believe could help prove their case or detract from an agency’s claims. Here are some of the different ways that federal employees can seek information during MSPB discovery: For example, imagine a TSA officer is facing removal based on alleged misconduct. They use discovery to request emails between their supervisor and HR officials discussing the proposed termination. These emails reveal that personal bias motivated by the employee’s religious faith rather than performance issues influenced the decision. This evidence becomes key in proving that the action was unjustified and discriminatory. How to Use MSPB Discovery Effectively Many federal employees assume they already have all relevant information about their situation when they appeal to MSPB. However, this is far from the case. Although federal agencies must share some relevant information with employees when they deliver the notice of proposed action, they often withhold other documents that could be crucial for your case. Don’t assume you understand the whole picture based on your agency’s initial disclosure. Additionally, the discovery process isn’t just about building your case—it’s also about anticipating the agency’s arguments. Discovery allows you to be proactive and avoid potential claims against you. For example, if you expect the agency to claim that your termination was due to performance issues, you can use discovery to obtain all performance reviews, commendations, and evidence that supports your track record. Discovery is a complex legal process, and navigating it can be challenging for federal employees whose careers may be on the line. The best way to make the most of the discovery process is to seek qualified legal assistance. An experienced federal employment lawyer can help draft information requests, stay on top of deadlines, and prepare a strong legal strategy to increase your chances of a positive outcome. Protect Your Federal Career with Trusted Legal Guidance If you are facing an MSPB appeal, you need a legal team that understands the complexities of the discovery process and how to use it to your advantage. The Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing PLLC has years of experience successfully supporting federal employees through their MSPB appeals. Our team can uncover key evidence, challenge agency defenses, and build a compelling case on your behalf. To learn more about how we can help you, contact our office today to schedule a consultation.

Feb 19, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 3 minutes | MSPB

MSPB and Affirmative Defenses: What You Should Know

Federal workers facing potential suspension, demotion, or removal often feel like the deck is stacked against them. Fortunately, federal law offers civil servants some key tools for challenging unfair agency actions, including the right to assert an affirmative defense before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). An affirmative defense can overturn or mitigate an agency’s disciplinary decision if successfully argued. Read on to learn more about how affirmative defenses work, MSPB’s evolving approach to handling them, and how federal employees can use them to protect their job security. What Is an Affirmative Defense? An affirmative defense is a legal argument that federal employees can use to negate a federal agency’s adverse employment action. In an MSPB affirmative defense, an employee doesn’t just argue that an agency misinterpreted facts or lacked evidence for their decision. Instead, an affirmative defense tries to show that an agency’s action violated an employee’s rights or federal law. Common affirmative defenses federal employees use when appealing to the MPSB include: Showing the MSPB that an agency engaged in misconduct in one of these acts is one of the most effective ways for federal employees to challenge and avoid career-damaging adverse actions. How Do Affirmative Defenses Work? Raising an affirmative defense is not just about making allegations—it requires evidence and legal arguments. The federal employee has the burden of proof to show that their agency’s action was improper by “a preponderance of the evidence.” Put simply, they need enough evidence to show the agency violated relevant laws and regulations. This typically involves: For example, imagine a federal employee faces removal after reporting agency fraud to a law enforcement authority. This employee might build an affirmative defense based on whistleblower retaliation with emails establishing that the adverse action happened shortly after their report and testimony from coworkers confirming the agency’s hostile response. If the employee presents enough evidence to demonstrate the agency was motivated by retaliation, they could have their removal reversed. How Has the MSPB’s Approach to Affirmative Defenses Changed? Recent decisions have altered how the MSPB evaluates affirmative defenses. In a 2022 ruling, the MPSB revised certain procedural standards that had provided some advantages to federal employees pursuing these defenses. For example, in the past, if an administrative judge made an error in ruling on a case involving an affirmative defense, the employee could automatically have their case reconsidered, even if their claim lacked substantive evidence or effort. Under the MSPB’s new guidelines, employees must make a more intentional effort to pursue affirmative defense cases. Otherwise, the MSPB has much more flexibility to dismiss a defense that doesn’t meet procedural requirements or lacks legal backing. Ultimately, federal employees must be careful and prepared when using affirmative defenses. Having the support of experienced legal counsel is essential for federal employees to ensure their case is presented correctly and given a fair chance. Dedicated Defenders of Federal Employee Rights Successfully asserting an affirmative defense before the MSPB requires deep knowledge of federal employment laws, procedural rules, and legal strategy. Fortunately, federal employees don’t have to take on the burden of building an affirmative defense alone. The Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing has provided dedicated and personalized service to federal employees and their families for years. Our team has extensive experience with MSPB cases and employee affirmative defenses, from harmful procedural errors to whistleblower retaliation claims. If you are facing an adverse action, contact our office today to schedule a consultation and learn more about how we can help. Resources: 5 U.S.C. § 7701(c)(2)(A), link.

Feb 3, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 2 minutes | Federal Employment Law

What Is Federal Employee Sick Leave Abuse?

Federal employees may at times face the temptation to call in sick so they can have an unscheduled day off. Federal employee sick leave abuse is a serious issue that all federal employees should try to avoid. Abuse of sick leave laws exist which can carry significant penalties for those who misuse their sick leave. There are also a few ways that supervisors can spot and investigate sick leave abuse by federal employees. If your supervisor has accused you of being a federal employee who’s committed sick leave abuse, contact a federal employee sick leave abuse lawyer right away. When Is It Okay to Use Sick Leave? The Office of Personnel Management (OPM), a federal agency that regulates the employment policies of most other federal agencies, states that federal employees may use sick leave when they need to: OPM does not define what constitutes an abuse of sick leave. That said, it’s reasonable to assume that any use of sick leave for reasons other than those listed above could constitute “sick leave abuse,” especially if done repeatedly and within a short period of time. Common signs of OPM sick leave abuse are: If an agency discovers that an employee is committing OPM sick leave abuse, the employee can face discipline. An employee can even face removal from federal service. What Employers Can Do About Sick Leave Abuse While OPM does not define sick leave abuse, it does establish procedures for employers to require evidence from employees who request sick leave. Specifically, an agency may require “administratively acceptable evidence” before granting sick leave. The definition of “administratively acceptable evidence.” For example, if an employee requests sick leave to care for a family member, the agency may require that the employee provide proof of their relationship with the family member. If an employee claims sick leave to visit a doctor, the agency can request a doctor’s note that confirms the visit. Do You Need a Federal Sick Leave Abuse Attorney? Let Us Help You Accusations of sick leave abuse are no joke. If you have been accused of abusing sick leave, you could be counseled, reprimanded, suspended, or even removed from your job. So if your supervisor has accused you of sick leave abuse, you need to contact a sick leave abuse attorney immediately. When looking for an attorney that can help you defend your rights, it’s absolutely essential that you select someone who has familiarity with your situation and the federal workplace. At the Law Office of Aaron D. Wersing, PLLC., we concentrate on representing federal employees and protecting their rights. Our firm has the experience needed to help federal employees who have been accused of misconduct. Even if you aren’t sure whether you need an attorney, it takes no time at all to contact us. Call today! You might also be interested in:

Nov 13, 2024 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 4 minutes | Workplace Discrimination

Protected Classes and Federal Workplace Discrimination

The right to earn a living free of discriminatory treatment is a cornerstone of federal employment law. Since the 1960s, federal law has progressively expanded to combat unfair prejudice, intolerance, and stereotypes against various groups. Understanding these protected classes and their rights is crucial for federal employees to safeguard themselves from workplace prejudice. This blog post will explain what federal employees should know about workplace discrimination and protected classes. We’ll cover the main groups protected by federal employment law, the limits of these protections, and some forms of non-protected class discrimination. What Qualifies as a Protected Class Under Federal Employment Law? The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces federal employment law and aims to protect specific groups of people who have historically been the targets of prejudice in the workplace. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1963 (Title VII) is the primary source of these protections. However, several other federal laws govern protections for additional groups. These laws include the Age Discrimination Act, the Rehabilitation Act, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, the Equal Pay Act, and the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. Altogether, these federal laws recognize and protect the following protected classes from workplace discrimination: When federal employees face unfavorable treatment in the workplace because they belong to one of these groups, they may have grounds for a discrimination claim. Notably, an employee doesn’t have to be a minority within a class to receive legal protections. For example, an agency that repeatedly promotes less-qualified female employees over qualified male employees can face penalties for sex discrimination. Workplace harassment targeted at a government employee because of their actual or perceived membership in a protected class is also illegal under federal discrimination law. What Is Not a Protected Class in the Federal Workplace? Many people may face prejudice in the workplace because of their lifestyles, backgrounds, or physical traits. Unfortunately, not all of these people are protected by federal law. Federal employees don’t have legal protections from workplace discrimination based on: Generally, agencies are allowed to base employment decisions on factors like these unless one of these factors intersects with another protected characteristic. For example, an agency that chooses not to hire someone because of their facial hair or clothing could violate Title VII if these features are part of the applicant’s religious practice. Can You Have a Legal Claim for Harassment Not Based on a Protected Class? Yes. A federal employee can face illegal harassment even if they are not a protected class member. Generally, there are two situations when federal employees may have grounds for a non-protected class discrimination claim: whistleblowing and employer retaliation. Let’s walk through what each of them involves. Whistleblowing Whistleblowers are federal employees who report illegal, unethical, or unsafe conduct in the workplace, including unlawful discrimination. An employee legally “blows the whistle” when they speak to an internal authority (e.g., HR, a manager) or external enforcing agency (i.e., the EEOC) about ongoing discrimination against a protected group. Under federal law, it’s just as illegal to target a discrimination whistleblower with harassment or mistreatment as it is to engage in discrimination itself. This is the case even if the whistleblowing employee isn’t a member of the discriminated protected group. For example, consider a 25-year-old USPS employee who hears a manager calling an elderly coworker derogatory and insulting names based on her age. After the young employee reports the incident to HR, the manager starts harassing and sabotaging their work. Even though the young employee doesn’t fall into a legally protected class for age, the law still safeguards them from harassment as a whistleblower. They can file a complaint with the EEOC and may even seek compensation for their mistreatment. Employer Retaliation Retaliation happens when an agency punishes an employee for participating in certain legally protected activities. Federal laws specifically ban retaliation against employees who: Illegal retaliation can take many forms, including termination, pay cuts, demotion, and general mistreatment. Any federal employee can be the victim of employer retaliation, regardless of protected group status. If you face harassment after engaging in a protected activity, consult a federal employment lawyer as soon as possible. Aaron D. Wersing: Dedicated Defender of Government Workers No one deserves to have their opportunities to earn a living limited by prejudice and harassment. At the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing PLLC, we understand the stress and uncertainty that government workers feel when navigating potential discrimination. That’s why we’ve made it our mission to help demystify the rights and legal protections federal employees enjoy in the workplace. Attorney Aaron D. Wersing has years of experience representing federal employees in disputes involving targeted harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. He’s fought for hundreds of federal employees to get justice for their mistreatment, and he’s prepared to help you. Contact our office today to schedule a consultation and learn more.

Sep 13, 2024 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 5 minutes | Wrongful Termination

Can a Federal Employee Sue The Federal Government?

Federal employees share many similarities with their privately employed counterparts. However, when a privately employed person is injured or wrongfully terminated, they can sue their employer. When the government is your employer, the question often arises: Can a federal employee sue the federal government? The answer is yes, with some caveats. Because the federal government has sovereign immunity, federal employees cannot file lawsuits against it unless the government waives this immunity. Therefore, if a federal employee wants to sue the federal government, they can do so only in limited circumstances. In these limited circumstances, the exact methods for suing the government may not be actual lawsuits, at least at first. Federal employees have to go through certain administrative procedures before they can file a lawsuit in federal court, and thankfully many times a complaint can be resolved during these administrative procedures. Our federal EEOC attorneys will explain what you need to know. What Can a Federal Employee Sue the Federal Government For? Wrongful termination and workplace discrimination are the most common lawsuits employees bring against their employers. Yes, you can sue the federal government for either of these reasons, though the process is different than with a private employer. While private sector employees may bring lawsuits against employers in civil court, federal employees must first file a claim with an independent review body rather than the court system. The initial claim sets in motion the administrative process federal employees must exhaust before they can sue the federal government. Once the employee receives a final decision from the reviewing agency, they may file a lawsuit in federal court. When Can a Federal Employee Sue Their Employer? A federal employee can sue their employer for discrimination, harassment, non-selection, demotion, wrongful termination, and for several other bases. For example, federal employee may have a claim to sue their federal agency if the employee: These are only a few of the common claims a federal employee may have to sue their employer. If you believe you were wrongfully terminated or suffered harassment at your federal workplace, you should contact a federal employment lawyer who can advise you of your rights and possible avenues of recovery. Suing a Federal Employer for Workplace Discrimination There are several laws, enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that protect federal employees against workplace discrimination and harassment. These laws include Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Pay Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, among others. Title VII is perhaps the most expansive, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex. Federal employees protected by these laws must go through a different complaint process compared to private sector employees. First, federal employees must speak with the equal employment opportunity counselor at the agency where the employee works. Most employees know this department as their EEO office, although some agencies do use varying acronyms, such as the Office of Resolution Management (ORM) at the Department of Veterans Affairs. Before filing a formal complaint, the employee must participate in either counseling or in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), usually mediation. If the employee can’t reach a resolution, they may then file a formal complaint with their federal agency. Unless the agency dismisses the complaint, they will then investigate the claims of discrimination and issue a Report of Investigation (ROI), along with a notice of right to request a hearing before an administrative judge (AJ) of the EEOC or a final agency decision. After hearing the case, the AJ submits an initial decision to the agency. The agency then issues a final decision indicating whether it agrees with the AJ’s conclusion and will implement the order. After receiving the agency’s final decision, an employee can file a lawsuit in federal civil court. Properly exhausting administrative remedies is necessary for obtaining review by a federal court. Hiring a federal employment lawyer to guide you through the process will ensure that you do not miss any deadlines and that your case is as strong as possible. Suing a Federal Employer for Wrongful Termination Wrongful termination occurs when an employer fires someone for any reason prohibited by the law. Firing an employee based on discrimination or in retaliation for something the employee did are examples of wrongful termination. Wrongful termination can also occur when employees are forced out on trumped up charges or coerced to resign. Filing a Wrongful Termination Claim With the exception of Title 38 VA employees and certain others, wrongful termination claims are usually filed with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), though employees may file these claims through the EEO process or union grievance as well. Employees may file a claim only with one of these options, generally, the one you elect first; discussing these options with a federal employment attorney will help you determine which is best for your situation. Appealing Wrongful Termination to the MSPB After filing an appeal with the MSPB, the employee engages in the discovery process with the agency, during which time each side gathers information to support their case. Information gathering may take the form of interrogatories, requests for admission, requests for the production of documents, or depositions. An experienced federal employment lawyer will be familiar with this process and can help you gather the right evidence during the discovery process. After discovery, the parties attend a hearing in front of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). Each side presents evidence and testimony that supports their case. Keep in mind that during this entire process, your attorney can negotiate with the other side to attempt to reach a settlement. If you and your employer can reach an agreement, it may be possible to avoid a hearing altogether. After the hearing, the ALJ will review the evidence and issue a decision. If you “win” at the hearing, the ALJ may award relief including back pay, reinstatement, and attorney fees. Similar to a claim with the EEOC, if the ALJ’s final decision is not in your favor,...

Aug 15, 2024 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 4 minutes | Federal Employment Law

Bullying In The Workplace Under Federal Law

If you have suffered bullying in the workplace, you might be able to receive relief under federal law if the bullying has certain characteristics. As a federal employee, you can maintain legal action for bullying if that bullying also qualifies as harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. If you are unsure if bullying at work is actionable, don’t resign yourself to the stress and fear, contact an experienced workplace bullying lawyer immediately for help. You do not have to tolerate working in a hostile work environment, let alone any workplace bullying. Is Workplace Bullying Illegal? It depends. Federal laws on workplace bullying are really laws against harassment. Employment bullying qualifies as illegal harassment if it’s a condition to continue your employment or it’s severe and pervasive enough for a reasonable person to consider it hostile. Bullying cannot be illegal harassment unless it’s unwelcome conduct motivated by one of the following factors: Your employer can be guilty of harassing you for being a member of a protected group mentioned above or for perceiving you to be a member of a protected group. Your employer can be liable for harassment committed by a supervisor, one of their agents, a co-worker, or a non-employee. You also don’t have to be the person harassed to maintain a legal action. If harassment of another person affects you, you could have a claim. Can You Sue For Workplace Bullying? You may be wondering, can you sue for workplace bullying? Yes. Legal action against workplace bullying is available to you if the bullying fits the definition of harassment under federal law. However, federal employees can bring workplace bullying lawsuits only after they have followed the steps to make an administrative complaint with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) office. Workers can sue their boss, manager, or supervisor for unfair treatment if it violates employment law. The most common claims fall under anti-discrimination laws, established by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. What Is the Procedure for Filing Workplace Bullying Complaints and Workplace Bullying Lawsuits? There are many steps on the way to filing a lawsuit against your employer for harassment. Suing for workplace bullying can be a complicated process, and a lawyer for workplace bullying can help you fulfill every step. 1. Filing a Workplace Bullying Complaint If you are a federal employee, bullying in the workplace law requires that you first reach out to an EEO counselor at your employer’s agency within 45 days of suffering harassment. You can either take part in counseling or alternative dispute resolution (ADR). If ADR or counseling doesn’t solve the problem, you can file a formal complaint with your agency’s EEO office. You have 15 days after receiving an EEO counselor’s filing notice to file a complaint. The agency can either dismiss your complaint for procedural reasons, or conduct an investigation. The agency has 180 days to investigate. After investigating, the agency gives you a notice about asking for a hearing or issuing a decision about whether there was discrimination. If you want a hearing, it is held before an administrative law judge. You have 30 days from the agency’s hearing notice to file for a hearing. You can request a hearing in writing or online. After the judge makes a decision, the agency gets 40 days to decide if they are going to grant you relief that the judge orders. This decision is called a final order. If you don’t agree with the final order, you can request an appeal within 30 days. You can also ask for reconsideration of the appeal decision within 30 days. If you follow the procedure correctly, you have many chances to get justice against harassment. An experienced attorney for workplace bullying can preserve your rights at every level of the process. How To File A Workplace Bullying Lawsuit Once you have been through the administrative complaint and appeals process, you can file a bullying-at-work lawsuit. There are a number of different times when you can file a lawsuit, depending on the situation. To file a lawsuit against your employer for violating laws against workplace bullying, you have to follow these timelines: A workplace bullying attorney can determine if the time is right for you to file a lawsuit and champion your rights to a safe workplace in court. If you are curious about workplace anti-bullying laws by state, many of them are similar to the federal laws (though deadlines and procedures vary). But you must follow the federal procedures above if you are a federal employee. Contact Our Federal Employment Attorneys for the Protection You Need Please remember that you don’t have to endure every hostile behavior at work to receive a paycheck, and you should not have to work in a hostile work environment. The workplace bullying lawyers at the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D Wersing PLLC are experienced in federal employment law and dedicated to protecting federal employees’ rights. Contact us online or call us at 866-508-2158 for the guidance and protection you need.

Aug 8, 2024 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 3 minutes | Workplace Discrimination

Examples of Military Discrimination in the Federal Workplace

Veterans deserve our utmost respect and gratitude for their sacrifices to protect our country. Unfortunately, stereotypes and prejudicial assumptions about servicemembers do exist, even among federal civilian employers. When veterans face targeted mistreatment in the workplace, it’s not just unacceptable—it’s illegal under federal law. This blog will cover what veterans should know about military discrimination in the federal workplace. We’ll discuss the laws that protect service members in the federal workplace and cover examples of veteran discrimination to watch out for. Protections for Veterans in the Federal Workplace Federal law grants military veterans a number of rights and protections when they return to civilian life. Let’s look at some of these protections specifically offered to veterans seeking federal civilian employment or reemployment. Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act This federal law is the foundation of the protections against veteran workplace discrimination. The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) bans all public and private civilian employers from discriminating based on an employee or job candidate’s past, present, or future military service. This means that it’s illegal to consider someone’s military service when it comes to employment decisions such as hiring, firing, promoting, extending benefits, and more. Under USERRA, certain service members can also receive other employment benefits. For example, if an eligible veteran leaves civilian employment to perform military service, they have the right to be promptly reemployed in their prior position when they return. Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act Many veterans also enjoy protections under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA prohibits employers from discriminating against qualified employees with a physical or mental disability. This includes discrimination against veterans with PTSD or other psychological impairments acquired through military service or otherwise. Although the ADA enforces these protections in the private sector, the Rehabilitation Act applies the same standards and rights to employees with disabilities in the public sector. It’s important to note that the ADA definition of disability is different from the standards used by the VA to assign disability ratings for service-connected medical conditions. Under the ADA, a disability is a mental or physical impairment that prevents someone from performing one or more “major life activities,” including: Veterans with medical conditions that interfere with these or other major life activities are entitled to reasonable accommodations from an employer. Reasonable accommodations can include a variety of alterations to the work environment that allow the veteran to fulfill their job duties despite their physical or mental limitations. Employers who refuse to consider requests for disability accommodations or retaliate against you for making such requests are violating federal law. What Does Military Discrimination in the Workplace Look Like? Employment discrimination against military service members can take many forms. Some examples of veteran discrimination at work include: This is not an exhaustive list. Keep in mind that some discriminatory behaviors can be subtle and easy to overlook as part of regular workplace conflict. If you’re unsure whether you’re facing targeted mistreatment, it’s best to consult with an employment lawyer. Can a Protected Veteran Be Fired? If you’re an eligible service member, USERRA may prohibit your employer from firing you without cause for a period after you return to civilian work. This doesn’t mean that you can’t be terminated at all. It just means your employer must have a valid, business-related reason for dismissing you. Under USERRA, protected veterans who served for more than 180 days can’t be fired without cause for up to one year after their reemployment. For veterans who performed for between 30 and 180 days of service, this protection extends up to six months after you return to civilian work. Defending the Rights of Veterans in Public Service Targeted mistreatment of military service members in the workplace is just as illegal as discrimination due to sex, race, or religion. If you suspect that the mistreatment you face at work is motivated by your veteran status, contact an employment lawyer immediately. At the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D Wersing PLLC, we’re proud to represent those who have served our country. Our attorneys know federal employment law and veteran discrimination protections inside and out, and we’re prepared to help you understand and exercise your legal rights. With years of experience advocating for federal employees, our legal team has the skill, integrity, and dedicated support to help you get the justice you deserve. Contact our office by phone or online to learn more and schedule a consultation.

Feb 27, 2024 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 3 minutes | Workplace Discrimination

Federal Efforts to Promote Equal Pay for Federal Employees

For decades, the federal government has been a pioneer in the quest for equal pay stands. Its perseverance stands as a testament to the ongoing commitment to gender equality and non-discrimination. But what do these efforts involve? It began with the Equal Pay Act, which required federal employees to receive equal pay for equal work, no matter their sex or gender. This law helped shrink the pay gap from 28% to 11% between 1998 and 2007. More recently, the Biden Administration has taken additional steps to further shrink the wage gap and strengthen the protections of the Equal Pay Act for federal employees. Today we’ll discuss the Equal Pay Act and how it protects federal employees from unequal pay. We’ll also discuss recent actions by the Biden Administration to promote equal pay for federal employees. If you think you are not receiving equal pay because of your sex, contact our team of dedicated federal employment attorneys today. What Is the Equal Pay Act? The Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA) stands as the primary federal effort to eliminate the longstanding disparities in pay between men and women. Congress crafted it with one simple intention: to guarantee that federal employees in the same workplace who perform substantially similar work under similar conditions receive equal pay. Rather, agencies must set the pay for federal employees according to seniority, merit, efficiency, or some other factor that does not consider gender. It further states that agencies cannot reduce any employee’s wage to eliminate wage gaps between men and women. The EPA contains several other points: As with Title VII violations, federal employees who suspect that they are not receiving equal pay must contact an EEO counselor at their agency within 45 days of the alleged violation. Remedies under the EPA can include back pay for up to three years before the filing of a charge, liquidated damages, and legal costs. Who Does the Equal Pay Act Protect? The protective reach of the EPA extends to all federal employees. It also extends to all employees who fall under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In practice, this means virtually all employment contexts, including private educational institutions, private sector positions, and state and local governments. Furthermore, the EPA implicitly recognizes the new definitions of gender and sex that are currently redefining the federal government. Therefore, employers cannot pay nonbinary individuals different wages. Initiatives by Recent Presidential Administrations Several recent presidential administrations have taken steps to build upon the EPA and further the cause of equal pay. In 2009, the Obama administration galvanized the passage of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. This act resets the statute of limitations on equal pay lawsuits with each discriminatory paycheck, effectively expanding the window for filing complaints. President Obama established the National Equal Pay Task Force as well. This task force aimed to crack down on violations of equal pay laws, improve interagency coordination and data collection, and boost enforcement efforts. More recently, the Biden administration issued a final rule by the Office of Personnel Management prohibiting federal agencies from considering someone’s current or past pay when determining their federal salary. We’re Ready to Help You Advance the Cause of Equal Pay Today. The path to achieving and maintaining equal pay within the federal workforce is ongoing. At the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D Wersing, PLLC, we are determined to assist any federal employee who suffers a violation of the EPA or other federal anti-discrimination laws. We promise to leverage our legal experience to uphold the principles of equality and fairness. If you believe you have been subjected to wage discrimination or if you are seeking advice on ensuring compliance with equal pay laws, do not hesitate to contact us. Together, we can turn the ideal of equal pay for equal work into an enduring reality for the federal workforce.