Mar 27, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 3 minutes | Whistleblower Claims

Whistleblower Retaliation Examples in the Federal Workplace

Speaking up against wrongdoing takes courage—especially in the federal workplace. Employees who report misconduct, fraud, or safety violations expect their concerns to be taken seriously. However, some whistleblowers face retaliation from their agencies instead of being applauded for their honesty. Retaliation can take many forms, some more subtle than others. Understanding how retaliation can appear is crucial for federal employees to protect themselves and their careers. This blog post will explain what federal employees should know about illegal retaliation, offer common whistleblower retaliation examples, and discuss basic steps to take to protect yourself. Understanding Whistleblower Retaliation Whistleblower retaliation occurs when a federal agency punishes an employee because they reported wrongdoing. Under the Whistleblower Protection Act and other federal laws, it’s illegal to retaliate against federal employees who speak out about: Illegal retaliation against federal employees can take many different forms. In broad terms, agencies engage in unlawful retaliation when they take adverse action against an employee for whistleblowing. Many workplace retaliation examples focus on blatant adverse actions against federal whistleblowers, such as: However, many whistleblower retaliation cases involve more subtle forms of agency backlash. For example, some agencies may use performance evaluations as a tool for retaliation by suddenly marking an employee as “unsatisfactory” despite a history of strong work. Isolation and exclusion are another overlooked form of retaliation that federal employees can face. If your supervisors or colleagues suddenly stop communicating with you, remove you from key projects, or exclude you from important meetings, that could be a red flag pointing to retaliation. Other whistleblowers may be under excessive supervision, subject to unwarranted investigations, or face threats and harassment. Examples of Whistleblower Retaliation in the Federal Workplace To better understand what whistleblower retaliation can look like, consider the following scenarios. VA Nurse Faces Sudden Reassignment After reporting patient neglect at a Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital, a nurse suddenly finds themselves reassigned to administrative duties. While they used to be responsible for direct patient care, the nurse was suddenly assigned exclusively to clerical work without any explanation. The reassignment out of a position actively practicing medicine limits their career prospects and job satisfaction. IRS Employee Endures an Internal Investigation An Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employee uncovers tax fraud within their department and follows proper channels to report it. Shortly afterward, they become the subject of an internal investigation based on vague accusations. Their colleagues are warned to avoid contact with them, and they are placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of the investigation. Federal Scientist Excluded from Critical Work A scientist at a federal agency raises concerns about manipulated research data used to support a policy decision. Soon after, they are removed from key projects and denied access to important research meetings. The agency quietly cuts the scientist’s funding, leaving them with little work to do and effectively stalling their career. What to Do If You Face Retaliation After Whistleblowing If you believe you are experiencing whistleblower retaliation, it is essential to act quickly. Here are some steps you can take to protect yourself: These steps can help protect your future livelihood and hold agencies accountable for their unlawful actions. Protect Yourself and Your Federal Career No federal employee should suffer retaliation for doing the right thing. If you believe your agency has taken action against you for reporting misconduct, you don’t have to face it alone. Recognizing whistleblower retaliation examples is the first step, but taking action is crucial. The Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing PLLC helps whistleblowers fight against retaliation and protect their careers. Our team can assist you in gathering evidence, filing claims with the appropriate agencies, and pursuing legal remedies to secure your rights. Contact us today for a confidential consultation and take the first step toward justice.

Mar 27, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 3 minutes | Federal Disability

Can You Sue for ADA Violations in the Federal Workplace?

Our country depends on thousands of federal employees with disabilities who provide critical service every day to keep the government running. Unfortunately, many capable federal employees still face unfair treatment and discrimination due to their medical conditions. Whether your employer refuses to provide reasonable accommodations, retaliates against you for requesting them, or treats you unfavorably because of your condition, it’s not just frustrating—it’s a violation of the protections laid out in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) as federal law. Many federal employees in this situation wonder: Can you sue for ADA violations? In this blog post, we’ll answer this common question and explain what government employees should know about their legal rights under federal disability law. What Is an ADA Lawsuit? An ADA lawsuit is a legal action filed by an employee who has experienced disability discrimination at work. Under the ADA, private-sector and state or local government employees can sue their employers if they face discrimination because of a qualifying physical or mental impairment. Common employer ADA violations that can lead to a lawsuit include: If a lawsuit is successful, employer penalties for ADA violations can include fines and mandatory policy changes. Employees may also receive back pay, job reinstatement, and reasonable work accommodations through an ADA lawsuit. Can You Sue for ADA Violations in the Federal Workplace? It is just as illegal for government employers to violate federal disability laws as it is for private-sector employers. However, federal employees who experience disability discrimination take action under a different law: the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which upholds rights and protections specifically for federal employees with disabilities. Although the Rehabilitation Act predates the ADA by nearly two decades, the two laws use almost identical standards and protections. So, when can you sue for ADA violations if you’re a federal employee? When your employer denies you any of the rights or protections you’re entitled to under federal disability law. However, you will pursue your claim through a slightly different legal route under the Rehabilitation Act rather than the ADA. How to Sue for an ADA Violation in the Federal Workplace Filing a lawsuit for disability discrimination as a federal employee involves several steps. Unlike private-sector employees, federal workers go through a different administrative complaint process before taking their disability discrimination case to court. Here’s how the process works: Federal employees generally have up to 90 days after receiving a final decision to seek legal counsel and sue for disability discrimination. However, it’s in your best interest to consult with a legal professional from the start—as soon as you suspect your rights have been violated. A skilled federal employment lawyer can evaluate your situation, explain your legal options in detail, and support you throughout the process of getting justice. Steadfast Advocacy for Federal Workers Fighting disability discrimination on your own can be exhausting, especially when facing a complex administrative and legal process. Fortunately, you don’t have to navigate this battle alone. At the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing PLLC, we help government employees challenge workplace discrimination and advocate for their rights. With years of experience serving employees across the federal government, attorney Aaron Wersing understands the complexities of the Rehabilitation Act and is prepared to guide you through every step of the process to assert your rights. Contact our office today to schedule a consultation and learn more about how we can help.

Mar 17, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 3 minutes | Federal Employment Law

Adverse and Disciplinary Actions for Federal Employees

Adverse and disciplinary actions for federal employees are different classes of punishments. Both adverse and disciplinary actions are taken by an employer for reasons of performance or misconduct. Adverse actions include more serious punishments, while disciplinary actions often refer to less serious punishments. However, both can cause irreparable harm to your career and personal life. If you are a federal employee, disciplinary actions by your employer are something you need to take seriously. Consider consulting a successful federal employment attorney today to help you protect your rights. What Are Disciplinary Actions For Federal Employees? Disciplinary actions for federal employees are measures agencies take for alleged violations of rules, regulations, or conduct standards. Your employing federal agency is almost always responsible for taking these actions. Disciplinary actions range from mild warnings or reprimands to severe measures like suspensions. Common disciplinary actions for federal employees include: Various federal laws and regulations govern disciplinary actions for federal employees. A few key laws are the Civil Service Reform Act, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, and the Privacy Act. These laws and regulations provide you with certain rights and protections, such as the right to a fair and impartial hearing, the right to appeal, and the right to representation by a union or an attorney. It’s important to note that disciplinary actions must be based on a valid cause, such as unacceptable performance, misconduct, or some violation of laws or regulations. In addition, any actions based on characteristics like your race, sexual orientation, or religion are illegal. You also have a few due process rights when receiving disciplinary action. Specifically, you have the right to make a response and receive a written notice of the action. What Are Adverse Actions For Federal Employees? Adverse actions are serious disciplinary measures taken by federal agencies against their employees. As with disciplinary actions, adverse actions always negatively affect your job, pay, or benefits. They also have a huge impact on your reputation and employability. Adverse actions can include, but are not limited to, the following: Adverse actions against federal employees are governed by federal laws and regulations, including the Civil Service Reform Act, the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, and the Privacy Act. Fortunately, these laws and regulations provide extensive rights and protections to federal employees. These include the right to a fair and impartial hearing, the right to appeal, and the right to representation by a union or an attorney. As with disciplinary actions, all adverse actions must stem from an act of misconduct or poor performance. In addition, federal agencies need to provide extensive due process procedures when they propose an adverse action against you. Specifically, you need to have at least 30 days’ advance notice of the action, an opportunity to respond to the proposed action, and the right to appeal it to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). Let Our Federal Employment Attorneys Help You! Contact Us Today Whether facing adverse or disciplinary actions, take the situation seriously. Even a minor reprimand can torpedo your chances of obtaining your dream position and leave you with a black mark on your record. If your employer plans to take disciplinary action against you, seek legal counsel immediately. At the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing PLLC, we are dedicated to preserving your rights. We will do whatever it takes to defend your good name. Furthermore, we will help you take action against discriminatory employers and other bad actors. Federal employment is a niche area, and most attorneys have little experience with it. However, we have decades of experience in federal employment issues. Don’t try to go it alone and jeopardize your career. Instead, give us a call at 866-612-5956 or get in touch with us online.

Mar 17, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 4 minutes | Workplace Discrimination

Reverse Discrimination in the Workplace—What You Should Know

We all know that discrimination in the workplace is unacceptable, and we all know that no federal employee should have to put up with it. However, not everyone knows that all kinds of discrimination are illegal. When most people imagine a discriminatory situation, they imagine racial minorities as the victims of racial “majorities.” They may be more accepting of discrimination when it operates in “reverse.” However, so-called reverse race discrimination is equally wrong and just as illegal as “regular” discrimination. At this point, you might be asking yourself, What is reverse discrimination? In this article, we will discuss reverse discrimination definition and the situations which best describe reverse discrimination in the workplace. If you think that you are the victim of reverse race discrimination, contact a workplace discrimination lawyer right away. What Is Reverse Discrimination? The term “reverse race discrimination” is sometimes considered controversial, and its definition can be challenging to explain. Reverse discrimination occurs when members of a dominant group face bias in favor of minority or disadvantaged groups. Reverse discrimination based on race or ethnicity is known as reverse racism. The idea of “reverse racism” focuses on prejudiced attitudes or discrimination against certain racial groups but overlooks a central aspect of racism: power. Racism is defined as “prejudice plus institutional power,” highlighting systemic inequities. The simplest definition is this – reverse discrimination occurs when majority groups, such as white men, face unfavorable workplace decisions due to their race or gender. Reverse race discrimination, for example, occurs in situations where historic racial minorities (like blacks or Hispanics) discriminate against white Americans based on their skin color. The fact that the target of discrimination belongs to a majority group does not exclude them from the protection of workplace discrimination laws. Discrimination is discrimination. It does not matter whether the victim is white, black, Christian, Muslim, handicapped, or able-bodied. Workplace discrimination lawyers know that discrimination laws apply to all groups, and can help any victim of any form of discrimination. Which of the Following Is an Example of Reverse Discrimination? Let’s consider a few examples of discrimination to understand which of the following situations constitute reverse discrimination: Which of the following is an example of reverse discrimination in America? If you guessed the first two scenarios, you’d be correct. The first scenario was reverse race discrimination because a black man, a member of a racial minority, was discriminating against a white man based on race. Similarly, the second scenario also constituted reverse discrimination. Sex-based discrimination has historically targeted women, so reverse discrimination occurred because a woman was making condescending sex-based comments to a man. However, the third scenario was not reverse discrimination because Christianity is a majority religion in the United States. So while the Christian in that scenario was harassing and potentially discriminating against their Hindu coworker, that would constitute normal discrimination of a minority. What Should I Do If I Am the Victim of Reverse Discrimination? Discrimination remains the same regardless of the victim’s race, gender, or religion. If you are experiencing reverse discrimination, consider taking the following actions: After you have taken these first steps, you need to consider hiring an attorney who handles cases of discrimination at work. Hiring an attorney for employment discrimination can help to resolve the reverse discrimination problem quickly. Furthermore, employment discrimination attorneys are familiar with all kinds of discrimination and can evaluate your case to see if you are eligible to obtain compensation. Finally, if you file a complaint against your agency, a federal employment workplace discrimination lawyer can help your case by collecting evidence, obtaining witnesses, and conducting settlement negotiations. Do You Need a Workplace Discrimination Attorney? Employment discrimination is always wrong, including reverse discrimination. Now that you know reverse discrimination’s definition, you will know when to contact an employment discrimination attorney. If you are currently experiencing such discrimination, you need an employment discrimination attorney right away. However, not all attorneys are of the same quality. Therefore, it is critical that you hire an attorney that has experience with your kind of case and is familiar with the unique features of the federal workplace. Contact Our Federal Employment Attorney To Discuss Your Case Today Here at the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D Wersing PLLC, we are dedicated to helping federal employees stand up for their rights. Over the years, our firm has helped countless federal employees with all kinds of discrimination complaints. Unlike other law firms, we are familiar with all of the dynamics of the federal workplace. We will help you stand up for your rights and hold discriminatory actors accountable. Even if you don’t know whether you need an attorney, you have nothing to lose by setting up an appointment. Contact us right away.

Feb 19, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 4 minutes | Federal Employment Law

Return to In-Person Work Executive Order for Federal Employees Administered by Trump

President Trump’s new mandate ending remote work for most federal employees has recently rocked the federal workforce. Although Trump had long suggested this was a priority for his administration, many federal employees are confused and concerned about what the return to in-person work executive order means in practice. This blog post will address common questions about the Trump executive order to return to work. We’ll unpack the order’s details, explain the transition timeline, and discuss any exemptions from the mandate. What Does the Return to Work Order Say? On his first day in office in 2025, President Trump issued a mandate directing all federal departments and agencies to take steps to end remote work arrangements. The order specifies that agency leaders should “require employees to return to work in person at their respective duty stations on a full-time basis” unless they have legitimate reasons for exemption under existing law. According to a report by the Office of Management and Budget, in May 2024, 1.1 million federal civilian employees were eligible for work arrangements that allowed them to do their jobs partly or entirely away from their work site. Of those employees, around 228,000 occupied remote positions where they were not expected to report to a physical location. This new directive marks a significant shift from the Biden administration’s approach, which embraced flexible work arrangements and expanded telework options for federal employees. When Does the Return to In-Person Work Executive Order Take Effect? President Trump’s return to work order officially went into effect on January 20, 2025, when it was issued. According to guidance from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), agencies had until 5:00 p.m. EST on January 24, 2025, to take the following steps toward complying with the mandate: Under OPM’s guidance, agencies will aim to fulfill the order’s requirements within 30 days. However, some flexibility with this timeline is possible for federal employees covered by collective bargaining agreements and other exceptional agency circumstances. Who Is Included in the Executive Order to Return to Work? The original order specifically addresses employees of “all departments and agencies in the executive branch of Government” engaged in any “remote work” arrangement. This includes any employees who work entirely from an alternative worksite and are not expected to report to agency locations. However, the OPM guidance clarifies that the president’s mandate also applies to federal employees performing “telework.” In the past, OPM allowed employees with telework arrangements to “report to work both at an agency worksite and alternative worksite on a regular and recurring basis each pay period.” Now, federal employees who’d previously had authorization for full—or part-time telework will also be expected to return to in-person duties. Are There Any Exceptions to the Federal Employee Return to Work Executive Order? The president’s mandate does include some exceptions. Certain employees may continue working remotely if they qualify for an exemption under federal law or agency policy. These exemptions include: If you believe you qualify for an exception, it is crucial to communicate with your agency and understand your rights. A lawyer experienced in federal employment law can help assess your situation and ensure the proper handling of your request. Proud Advocates for the Rights of Federal Employees Federal employees are understandably concerned about the impact of this executive order on their careers and personal lives. If you have questions about your rights, exemptions, or potential legal challenges, the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing PLLC is here to help. Our team understands the complexities of federal employment law and can help you navigate exemption requests, disability accommodations, and union protections. Additionally, if you experience retaliation for requesting an exemption or challenging the order, you may have legal recourse under federal whistleblower protections and anti-retaliation laws. Contact our office today to learn more about your rights and how we can help. Resources:

Feb 19, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 3 minutes | MSPB

What Is the MSPB Discovery Process & Why Is It Important?

For federal employees, preparing your appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) can feel complex and intimidating. Even though it’s your legal right to challenge unfair or unjust adverse employment actions, many employees still feel disadvantaged compared to their agencies. Fortunately, employees can access a powerful tool to help level the playing field: the MSPB discovery process. During discovery, federal workers can obtain crucial evidence that can make a significant difference in the outcome of their appeal. In this blog post, we’ll explain what federal employees should know about the discovery process in MSPB cases and how they can use it strategically to protect themselves and their careers. What Is the MSPB Discovery Process? Discovery is the legal process where both parties in a dispute exchange information before they meet in a formal hearing. It allows each side to gather and understand the evidence the other side is relying on. In MSPB appeals, discovery allows federal employees to collect documents, records, and testimony that can challenge the legitimacy of their agency’s decision. If you intend to claim that discrimination, retaliation, or procedural errors were behind your agency’s actions, discovery is vital to gathering the concrete evidence you might otherwise not have access to. What Does the MSPB Discovery Process Involve? Under MSPB discovery rules, federal employees must begin making information requests no later than 25 days after the acknowledgment order for the appeal is issued. The scope of federal discovery rules allows employees to request any information that they believe could help prove their case or detract from an agency’s claims. Here are some of the different ways that federal employees can seek information during MSPB discovery: For example, imagine a TSA officer is facing removal based on alleged misconduct. They use discovery to request emails between their supervisor and HR officials discussing the proposed termination. These emails reveal that personal bias motivated by the employee’s religious faith rather than performance issues influenced the decision. This evidence becomes key in proving that the action was unjustified and discriminatory. How to Use MSPB Discovery Effectively Many federal employees assume they already have all relevant information about their situation when they appeal to MSPB. However, this is far from the case. Although federal agencies must share some relevant information with employees when they deliver the notice of proposed action, they often withhold other documents that could be crucial for your case. Don’t assume you understand the whole picture based on your agency’s initial disclosure. Additionally, the discovery process isn’t just about building your case—it’s also about anticipating the agency’s arguments. Discovery allows you to be proactive and avoid potential claims against you. For example, if you expect the agency to claim that your termination was due to performance issues, you can use discovery to obtain all performance reviews, commendations, and evidence that supports your track record. Discovery is a complex legal process, and navigating it can be challenging for federal employees whose careers may be on the line. The best way to make the most of the discovery process is to seek qualified legal assistance. An experienced federal employment lawyer can help draft information requests, stay on top of deadlines, and prepare a strong legal strategy to increase your chances of a positive outcome. Protect Your Federal Career with Trusted Legal Guidance If you are facing an MSPB appeal, you need a legal team that understands the complexities of the discovery process and how to use it to your advantage. The Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing PLLC has years of experience successfully supporting federal employees through their MSPB appeals. Our team can uncover key evidence, challenge agency defenses, and build a compelling case on your behalf. To learn more about how we can help you, contact our office today to schedule a consultation.

Feb 19, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 3 minutes | MSPB

MSPB and Affirmative Defenses: What You Should Know

Federal workers facing potential suspension, demotion, or removal often feel like the deck is stacked against them. Fortunately, federal law offers civil servants some key tools for challenging unfair agency actions, including the right to assert an affirmative defense before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). An affirmative defense can overturn or mitigate an agency’s disciplinary decision if successfully argued. Read on to learn more about how affirmative defenses work, MSPB’s evolving approach to handling them, and how federal employees can use them to protect their job security. What Is an Affirmative Defense? An affirmative defense is a legal argument that federal employees can use to negate a federal agency’s adverse employment action. In an MSPB affirmative defense, an employee doesn’t just argue that an agency misinterpreted facts or lacked evidence for their decision. Instead, an affirmative defense tries to show that an agency’s action violated an employee’s rights or federal law. Common affirmative defenses federal employees use when appealing to the MPSB include: Showing the MSPB that an agency engaged in misconduct in one of these acts is one of the most effective ways for federal employees to challenge and avoid career-damaging adverse actions. How Do Affirmative Defenses Work? Raising an affirmative defense is not just about making allegations—it requires evidence and legal arguments. The federal employee has the burden of proof to show that their agency’s action was improper by “a preponderance of the evidence.” Put simply, they need enough evidence to show the agency violated relevant laws and regulations. This typically involves: For example, imagine a federal employee faces removal after reporting agency fraud to a law enforcement authority. This employee might build an affirmative defense based on whistleblower retaliation with emails establishing that the adverse action happened shortly after their report and testimony from coworkers confirming the agency’s hostile response. If the employee presents enough evidence to demonstrate the agency was motivated by retaliation, they could have their removal reversed. How Has the MSPB’s Approach to Affirmative Defenses Changed? Recent decisions have altered how the MSPB evaluates affirmative defenses. In a 2022 ruling, the MPSB revised certain procedural standards that had provided some advantages to federal employees pursuing these defenses. For example, in the past, if an administrative judge made an error in ruling on a case involving an affirmative defense, the employee could automatically have their case reconsidered, even if their claim lacked substantive evidence or effort. Under the MSPB’s new guidelines, employees must make a more intentional effort to pursue affirmative defense cases. Otherwise, the MSPB has much more flexibility to dismiss a defense that doesn’t meet procedural requirements or lacks legal backing. Ultimately, federal employees must be careful and prepared when using affirmative defenses. Having the support of experienced legal counsel is essential for federal employees to ensure their case is presented correctly and given a fair chance. Dedicated Defenders of Federal Employee Rights Successfully asserting an affirmative defense before the MSPB requires deep knowledge of federal employment laws, procedural rules, and legal strategy. Fortunately, federal employees don’t have to take on the burden of building an affirmative defense alone. The Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing has provided dedicated and personalized service to federal employees and their families for years. Our team has extensive experience with MSPB cases and employee affirmative defenses, from harmful procedural errors to whistleblower retaliation claims. If you are facing an adverse action, contact our office today to schedule a consultation and learn more about how we can help. Resources: 5 U.S.C. § 7701(c)(2)(A), link.

Feb 11, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 4 minutes | Federal Employment Law

Overview of COLA for Federal Employees

Annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) safeguard the financial security of federal retirees and their loved ones. Every year, the government calculates and pays out COLA to help offset the toll that rising inflation takes on federal retirement benefits. Most federal employees enjoying or approaching retirement recognize the importance of COLA. However, understanding how to calculate it isn’t always so straightforward. In this blog post, we’ll discuss how cost-of-living adjustments work for federal employees. We’ll answer some common questions, including: Remember, always speak to a professional if you have specific questions about your federal employment benefits. An attorney trained in federal employment law is the best resource for qualified advice tailored to your unique situation. What Is the COLA for Federal Employees Based On? Annual cost-of-living adjustments for federal retirement benefits are tied to the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). The CPI-W measures the change in consumer purchasing power over time. To do this, the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) collects monthly data on the cost of goods and services across the country. This includes information about the cost of food, housing, clothing, transportation, healthcare, education, recreation, and utilities. The Department of Labor uses this data on the inflation rate to make decisions about monetary policy and salary increases for civil servants. Since COLA aims to protect federal retirement benefits from eroding due to inflation, the CPI-W is an essential factor in the yearly cost-of-living adjustment calculator. Close to the end of the calendar year, the economists at the BLS compare the CPI-W from July, August, and September to the CPI-W from those months in the year before. Based on the rate of change in consumer prices, the BLS calculates whether eligible federal retirees can receive a COLA. For example, in December 2023, the federal government announced the year’s COLA payments based on the change in CPI-W from the third quarter of 2022 to the third quarter of 2023. Retirees and beneficiaries eligible for COLA should have received their payments in January 2024. Is COLA the Same for All Federal Employees? No. The amount of COLA you’re eligible for depends on your federal retirement plan. Let’s break down the two major types of retirement systems that federal employees fall into. Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) FERS is the current plan for managing retirement benefits for federal employees. It became effective in 1987 for all federal employees hired after 1983. For FERS beneficiaries, COLA payments can be broken down as follows: In all cases, the amount of a COLA is rounded down to the next whole dollar. Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) You may be enrolled in the CSRS if you’re a long-time federal employee who began working before 1984. COLA calculations are simpler for CSRS employees. The adjustment is always equal to any positively calculated increase in CPI-W. The COLA for federal employees in 2024 granted FERS beneficiaries an increase of 2.2%. For CSRS beneficiaries, the adjustment was 3.2%. To receive the full COLA payment, you must have been in retirement and receiving benefits for the full calendar year. If you retired within the last year, your COLA amount will be prorated. For example, imagine you retire in February 2024. By January 2025, when COLA is paid out, you’ll have been retired for 10 out of 12 months of the fiscal year, so you’ll receive ten-twelfths of whichever COLA payment you’re entitled to. Who Can Receive COLA? Eligibility for COLA also differs between the two federal retirement systems. Under the current FERS plan, you’re eligible for COLA if you are: However, under CSRS, all retirees and eligible survivors can receive cost-of-living adjustments to benefits, regardless of age. Questions About Your Federal Benefits? We Have Answers Navigating federal retirement plans can be overwhelming. Since cost-of-living adjustments change yearly, ensuring you’re receiving the benefits you’re entitled to can be challenging. If you have questions, don’t settle on generic advice from any employment lawyer. Contact the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing for qualified, reliable support from a trained federal employment lawyer. For years, our team of legal professionals has been helping shed light on the ins and outs of FERS and CSRS for beneficiaries and their loved ones. Our advocates can help you understand the rights granted by your federal retirement system and ensure you’re fully compensated for your years of service. To schedule a consultation, contact our office by phone or online.

Feb 3, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 4 minutes | FERS Disability

Can You Still Work While on FERS Disability?

Many federal employees rest easy knowing they have a disability retirement option in the federal government. Under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), employees who are unable to perform their job duties due to a medical problem may be eligible for disability retirement. However, that doesn’t always mean you have a secure financial future. Most civil servants need additional income to supplement their federal disability payments. Despite this need, many federal employees choose not to work because they think having another job will make them ineligible for disability retirement benefits. But this raises some important questions. Can you still work while applying for disability benefits? Can you still work while on disability? The answer is that you can work while on FERS disability under certain conditions. Read on to learn more about the rules and regulations governing working while on FERS disability. We’ll separate the myths from the facts so that you can take action to secure your future. Overview of FERS Disability Retirement FERS provides a comprehensive retirement and disability program for federal employees, including disability retirement benefits. You need to fulfill two requirements to be eligible for FERS disability retirement. First, you must have completed at least 18 months of creditable federal civilian service. Second, you must suffer a disability that makes you unable to successfully perform your job duties. The second requirement can take some time to complete because agencies will try to provide you with reasonable accommodation first. Your agency may also try to reassign you to another position. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is responsible for processing disability retirement applications and making determinations on eligibility. An employee approved for FERS disability retirement will receive a monthly annuity payment based on their length of service and the highest three years of average pay. Can You Still Work While on FERS Disability? So, can you work while on federal disability? Yes. As OPM itself makes clear, federal employees who receive FERS disability retirement benefits can generally work in the private sector without seeing a loss of their benefits. That said, there are restrictions on how much income they can earn from their employment. OPM sees federal employees in either one of two categories. If you are under age 60, OPM will stop paying your disability annuity if they determine you can earn a certain level of income. That amount is 80% of the current rate of base for the position you had when you retired. OPM will send you a survey form called “Annuitant’s Report of Income.” In this survey, you must state all income earned from wages and self-employment. If you hit the 80% threshold, you will lose your disability benefits. You won’t lose your benefits immediately. Instead, you will not receive those benefits for six months after the end of the year that you hit the 80% mark. There are no earnings limits for federal employees who receive Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits in addition to FERS disability retirement benefits. However, they must still meet the eligibility requirements for both programs and report their earnings to both the OPM and the Social Security Administration (SSA). Situations That May Cause You to Lose Your Disability Benefits OPM guidance specifies that you can lose your benefits in several other ways. One trigger for losing benefits is regaining employment in a position similar to your prior federal position. Another way involves periodic medical reviews. OPM will periodically review your disability eligibility. If they decide to review your case, they will ask you to obtain updated medical paperwork from your doctor. They will also inquire about your employment status. If your doctor communicates that you no longer have a disability, your disability payments will end. Furthermore, if you fail to respond to OPM’s requests, they will suspend your disability benefits. What If I Am Age 60 or Older? If you are 60 or older, the situation changes significantly. OPM will conduct a periodic medical review only at your request. Moreover, the 80% threshold mentioned earlier in this article will not apply. That means you can work a private job paying more than your former government job while receiving your disability annuity. How to File for FERS Disability Retirement To apply for FERS disability retirement, federal employees must complete and submit Form SF 3107, Application for Immediate Retirement. You’ll also need to submit supporting medical documentation and other required forms. You send the application to your agency, which will forward it to OPM for review and determination. The application process for FERS disability retirement is often complex and time-consuming. Working with an experienced FERS disability retirement lawyer can help ensure your application is successful. Related Article: What Is The FERS Disability Processing Time? What About CSRS Disability Retirement? While this article has focused on FERS disability retirement, it’s important to note that it doesn’t cover all federal employees. A few, more senior employees may fall under the old Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). The CSRS has a separate disability retirement program with its own set of limitations. Contact us today to learn more about your disability retirement options under the CSRS. Let Us Help You Overcome Federal Disability Retirement Challenges– Contact Our FERS Disability Lawyers Today If you are a federal employee considering applying for FERS disability retirement, you need legal assistance. You will probably also benefit from a lawyer if you are on disability retirement benefits and interested in working. In either scenario, the Federal Employment Law Firm of Aaron D. Wersing, PLLC, can help. Our experienced attorneys specialize in representing federal employees in a wide range of legal matters. In addition, we pride ourselves on providing incredible customer service and excellent outcomes. Reach out to us today.

Feb 3, 2025 | By Aaron D. Wersing | Read Time: 2 minutes | Federal Employment Law

What Is Federal Employee Sick Leave Abuse?

Federal employees may at times face the temptation to call in sick so they can have an unscheduled day off. Federal employee sick leave abuse is a serious issue that all federal employees should try to avoid. Abuse of sick leave laws exist which can carry significant penalties for those who misuse their sick leave. There are also a few ways that supervisors can spot and investigate sick leave abuse by federal employees. If your supervisor has accused you of being a federal employee who’s committed sick leave abuse, contact a federal employee sick leave abuse lawyer right away. When Is It Okay to Use Sick Leave? The Office of Personnel Management (OPM), a federal agency that regulates the employment policies of most other federal agencies, states that federal employees may use sick leave when they need to: OPM does not define what constitutes an abuse of sick leave. That said, it’s reasonable to assume that any use of sick leave for reasons other than those listed above could constitute “sick leave abuse,” especially if done repeatedly and within a short period of time. Common signs of OPM sick leave abuse are: If an agency discovers that an employee is committing OPM sick leave abuse, the employee can face discipline. An employee can even face removal from federal service. What Employers Can Do About Sick Leave Abuse While OPM does not define sick leave abuse, it does establish procedures for employers to require evidence from employees who request sick leave. Specifically, an agency may require “administratively acceptable evidence” before granting sick leave. The definition of “administratively acceptable evidence.” For example, if an employee requests sick leave to care for a family member, the agency may require that the employee provide proof of their relationship with the family member. If an employee claims sick leave to visit a doctor, the agency can request a doctor’s note that confirms the visit. Do You Need a Federal Sick Leave Abuse Attorney? Let Us Help You Accusations of sick leave abuse are no joke. If you have been accused of abusing sick leave, you could be counseled, reprimanded, suspended, or even removed from your job. So if your supervisor has accused you of sick leave abuse, you need to contact a sick leave abuse attorney immediately. When looking for an attorney that can help you defend your rights, it’s absolutely essential that you select someone who has familiarity with your situation and the federal workplace. At the Law Office of Aaron D. Wersing, PLLC., we concentrate on representing federal employees and protecting their rights. Our firm has the experience needed to help federal employees who have been accused of misconduct. Even if you aren’t sure whether you need an attorney, it takes no time at all to contact us. Call today! You might also be interested in:

Blog